news-16102024-154258

Sir Keir Starmer is being asked to support a new law that would ban smartphones in schools to prevent children from “doom-scrolling.” This request comes after Number 10 declined to endorse the plan. Former teacher and current Labour MP Josh MacAlister is the driving force behind this initiative, aiming to make social media and smartphones less addictive for children. He believes that empowering parents and teachers to limit screen-time is essential.

The Safer Phones Bill, introduced by MacAlister, has garnered support from various MPs across party lines, as well as education unions, charities, and current and former children’s commissioners. While the bill proposes legally banning smartphones from schools, Sir Keir’s spokesperson stated that the government has no immediate plans to pass such legislation. This is because headteachers already have the authority to prohibit phones in classrooms, even without legal support.

Despite the government’s reluctance, Health Secretary Wes Streeting has hinted at some level of support for the bill, acknowledging the importance of the ongoing debate. MacAlister remains undeterred, viewing this as a campaign of persuasion. In addition to banning smartphones from classrooms, the bill aims to raise the age of “internet adulthood” from 13 to 16, strengthen Ofcom’s powers to protect children from addictive apps, and commit the government to reviewing further regulations regarding mobile phone use by children under 16.

The current guidance in English schools regarding mobile phone usage is not legally binding and was recently implemented by the previous Conservative government. MacAlister emphasizes the urgent need to address the public health crisis of increasing mental health issues among children, disrupted sleep patterns, and the negative impact of phones in schools. He stresses the importance of establishing collective rules to assist parents and teachers in making better choices for children.

Doom-scrolling, a behavior characterized by excessive consumption of negative online content without pause, is a growing concern among children. MacAlister argues that imposing laws to address this issue does not equate to creating a “nanny state.” He calls on big tech companies to engage with the regulatory process to protect children and maintain public support.

Failure to act on this matter may result in heightened demands for a complete ban on smartphones for children, which could pose challenges for the tech industry. MacAlister urges tech companies to collaborate on shaping regulations to safeguard children while continuing to operate successfully in the UK market. By aligning with child protection measures, the tech industry can maintain public trust and support.